Marshall-Wells Co. v. Tenney
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, counsel moved for a nonsuit in favor of defendants, which was denied. The principal question on this appeal is, Did the agreement between the plaintiff and other directors of the Multnomah Iron Works, whereby the creditors took charge of the affairs of the Multnomah Iron Works, and the acts performed by the Marshall-Wells Company pursuant to the agreement, in any way affect or release the defendants from liability under the guaranty?
The evidence in the case shows that the creditors’ agreement was entered into without the knowledge or consent of defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delsman v. FriedlanderOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Staver & Walker v. LockeOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Gile Grocery Co. v. LachmundOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Fisk v. StoneSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
- Newcomb Bros. Wall Paper Co. v. EmersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mitchell's, Inc. v. FriedmanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. E. E. Cloer General Contractor, Inc., and United States Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Lloyd Corporation v. O'CONNOROregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Marc Nelson Oil Products, Inc. v. Grim Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.