Legal Opinion

Livengood v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1986No. DMV No. 851031 1448; CA A40090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) finding him to be an habitual offender and revoking his driver’s license. Former ORS 484.727.1 The issue is whether a prior MVD order should be given res judicata effect. We hold that the prior order is not a bar to the present proceeding and affirm.

There have been two hearings to determine whether petitioner’s driving privileges should be revoked. The hearings followed MVD’s determination from petitioner’s driving record that he is an habitual offender as defined by former ORS 484.705 (now ORS 809.600).2 The first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Oregon City Federation of Teachers v. Oregon City Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Capital Investments, Inc. v. LofgrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cassidy v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API