Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Douglass

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided March 15, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Stephen B. Hastings and others against Daisy Grace Douglass. On motion to dismiss. Bill ordered dismissed, unless complainants file a disclaimer as to all right to assail defendant’s marriage and acknowledge her interest in estate of her deceased husband.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYTON, District Judge.

S. P. Douglass died intestate in Berkeley county, tins state, without issue. Shortly before his death he intermarried with the defendant, who survived him and has qualified as administratrix of his estate, tie died seised of real and personal property estimated to be worth more than $40,000. The plaintiffs, his collateral heirs at law, all residents of the state of Pennsylvania, have instituted this suit in equity for two purposes: First, to have the marriage between decedent and the defendant, Daisy Grace Douglass, declared void because of mental incapacity on the part…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spindel v. SpindelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  2. Abdul-Rahman Omar Adra v. CliftDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
  3. Gardiner v. Automatic Arms Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1921
  4. Husted v. HustedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Johnson v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API