Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Automatic Arms Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 19, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit by E. A. Gardiner and others against the Automatic Arms Company and the Savage Arms Company. On motion to dismiss bill and to strike out certain allegations.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

This is a motion by one of the defendants, the Savage Arms Corporation, to dismiss the bill of complaint and also to strike out certain allegations. The plaintiffs are stockholders of the McClean Arms & Ordnance Company, which company is not a party to this suit. The plaintiffs bring the suit on behalf of themselves and all other stockholders of the McClean Company who may join in this action as parties complainant and share the expenses. The defendants are the Automatic Arms Company and the Savage Arms Corporation, New York State corporations.

The bill of complaint…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Watts v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Norton v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. McClean v. BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
  5. Abelow v. SymondsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API