Madrigal v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
Petitioner Jose Madrigal seeks annulment of an award made by the respondent commission disallowing his claim for compensation under its policy of insurance issued to the A. B. C. Produce Company, respondent employer. The lawfulness of the commission’s action in reforming its policy of insurance excluding petitioner from coverage after he had suffered an injury is the decisive question presented.
There is no material conflict in the evidence. Petitioner was employed by the produce company as an agricultural worker not engaged in the use of machinery. During the noon hour on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- McCain v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming TableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.