Legal Opinion
State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, C. J.
This is an original proceeding by information in the nature of quo warranto to oust respondent, Missouri Utilities Company, from the city of Sikeston, Missouri, and exclude it from all rights, privileges and franchises of furnishing electric light and power within said city, and from all rights, privileges and franchises of occupying the streets, avenues and alleys of said city Avith its poles, wires and other electrical equipment.
In the information, which was signed by the Attorney-General of the State of Missouri, at the relation of the city of Sikeston, and by the City Attorney of the city…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- State ex rel. Major v. Arkansas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Peterson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State ex rel. Brown v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State Ex Rel. Moss v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- City of Summerville v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.