Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Washingto'n Metropolitan'Area Transit Authority (WMATA) seeks to enjoin two grievance arbitrations initiated by Local 689, Amalgamated Transit' Union .(Local 689 or the Union). WMATA notes that a putative class action lawsuit, Little v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Civil Case No. 14-1289(RMC) (D.D.C.), is already pending in this Court’ on similar allegations. WMATA further contends that the grievances are riot subject to arbitration because they do not involve any WMATA employee who has been adversely…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Max Pievsky v. Thomas J. Ridge, in His Capacity as the Governor of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Brandsafway Services, LLC v. Laborers International Union of North America, Local 169District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (Smart) - Transportation DivisionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018