Legal Opinion
Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 20, 2018No. Civil Case No. 18–1370 (RMC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the arbitration of four grievances, initiated by Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union (Local 689 or the Union). The Union's angst is caused by policies under which WMATA checks the criminal histories of applicants and, on occasion, employees. WMATA notes that this Court has already entered a permanent injunction with respect to the first two grievances, and that the third is covered by an agreement between the parties to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Barksdale v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018