Legal Opinion

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-1370Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 18-1370 (RMC) v. ) ) LOCAL 689, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT ) UNION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the arbitration of four grievances, initiated by Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union (Local 689 or the Union). The Union’s angst is caused by policies under which WMATA checks the criminal histories of applicants and, on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Barksdale v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API