Legal Opinion
Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Stricklin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 20, 1933No. 20794PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Ci J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $246 in favor of H. M. Stricklin and against the Amerada Petroleum Corporation. Recovery is for medical services and hospital facilities supplied by the plaintiff below, a physician, to one Dewey Baker, an employee of appellant.
It is contended that exclusive jurisdiction to determine the cause is vested in the State Industrial Commission by section 7288, C. O. S. 1921 [O. S. 1931, sec. 13354],
There is no merit in this contention. Exclusive jurisdiction in such cases is not vested in the State Industrial Commission. Section 10, art.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Reed v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Freeman v. Junge Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Tri-State Casualty Ins. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Tri-State Casualty Ins. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951