Legal Opinion

Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1926No. 16384PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Defendant’s .first and principal contention for reversal of this • cause is alleged error of the trial court in overruling its motion to quash service of summons and in denying its plea' to the jurisdiction. In support of this contention it is asserted that Comp. Stat. 1921, sec. 5442, is unconstitutional and void, in that it operates to deprive this defendant of its property without due process of law. That section reads:

“Any foreign corporation, doing business in the state of Oklahoma, having failed either to appoint an agent upon whom service of summons or other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Allsman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers Nat. Grain Corporation v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Investors' Mortgage Security Co. v. Strauss & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. W. L. Feely Lumber Co. v. Bookstaver-Burns Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. StricklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API