Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 1951No. 33790Published
1Opinion of the Court
205 Okla. 117 (1951)
235 P.2d 703
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & IND. CO.
v.
TRI-STATE CASUALTY INS. CO.
No. 33790.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 3, 1951.
Rehearing Denied September 25, 1951.
Gilliland, Ogden, Withington, Shirk & Vaught, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Looney, Watts, Ross, Looney & Smith, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
WELCH, J.
The plaintiff Hartford paid some $400 for medical services rendered to an injured workman, Tom Harper, and seeks to recover that sum from the defendant Tri-State. Hartford contends that it was insurance carrier for Metropolitan Paving Company, the regular…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Black Gold Petroleum Co. v. HirshfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Tri-State Casualty Ins. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.