Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1951No. 33790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff Hartford paid some $400 for medical services rendered to an injured workman, Tom Harper, and seeks to recover that sum from the defendant Tri-State. Hartford contends that it was insurance carrier for Metropolitan Paving Company, the regular employer of the workman in hazardous employment; that at the time of his injury the said workman had been loaned to the Metropolitan Construction Company; that following his *118injury it was the duty of the Metropolitan Construction Company and of defendant Tri-State to pay his medical expense; that plaintiff Hartford paid it by mistake and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Black Gold Petroleum Co. v. HirshfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. StricklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Hobelman v. Mel Krebs Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Jones v. Holiday Inn ExpressNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. First Baptist Church, Bristow v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. State Ex Rel. Ammons v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API