Legal Opinion
Swift & Co. v. Walden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 1935No. 25690PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
On April 20, 1931, Mrs. L. B. Hurley sustained an injury while working for Swift & Company at Ardmore. Under the duties imposed upon them by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Swift & Company and its insurance carrier, Security Mutual Casualty Company, immediately furnished her medical attention, hospitalization, and treatment. There is no contention in the present ease that such medical services were not adequate.
Some time between July 4 and July 20, 1932, Mrs. Hurley, still being under the care and treatment of the employer’s physician in Ardmore, was visited by Dr. Dewey Walden, of Oklahoma…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steffens Ice Cream Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Mead Bros. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Howard v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Standard Paving Co. v. LemmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shee v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
- MARTIN v. PHILLIPSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Black Gold Petroleum Co. v. HirshfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Romero v. Workers' Compensation Court, CCB, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Patterson Steel Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.