Legal Opinion

Lorren v. Baroda Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1952No. Docket 56, Calendar 45,382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant corporation on a promissory note for $10,000 executed August 4, 1946, for a loan of money by plaintiff to the corporation. The note was not disputed. The defendant claims set-off and recoupment amounting to $9,504.50. The circuit judge hearing the case without a jury disallowed the claim of set-off and recoupment and entered judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The sole controversy is whether the claims of set-off and recoupment should have been allowed. The defendant corporation was organized March 8,1946. Its incorporators, stockholders and directors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zachary v. MilinMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cope-Swift Co. v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Carnahan v. M. J. & B. M. Buck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Faust v. Kent-Moore Organization, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baks v. MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Fletcher Oil Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Baks v. MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Rudolph Beuc v. RethemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API