Legal Opinion
Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1908No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Bay; Sharpe, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Charles S. Ruttle against the What Cheer Coal Mining Company for services rendered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant on the common counts in assumpsit to recover for services alleged to have been performed in its behalf, and filed the following bill of particulars:
“1904, July 23, to 1905, July 17.
“ To personal services in and in connection with making and looking after contracts and supervising the construction of railroad grade and railroad bridges.
“To services in and in connection with and looking after contracts for the construction of building, including tipple, engine house, boiler house and other buildings.
“To services generally in connection with and in the construction and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re MoserMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Louisville Banking Co. v. EisenmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. . the Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hastings Industrial Co. v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lorren v. Baroda Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910