Legal Opinion

Zachary v. Milin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1940No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 40,969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

This is an information in the nature of quo warranto filed by Theodore Zachary and William N. Phillips to test the right of Ernest C. Wunseh and Charles Milin to hold, use, exercise and enjoy the office of directors of the Great Lakes Champagne Wineries, Inc., a Michigan corporation.

The result depends upon the validity of the directors’ meeting at the company’s laboratory December 8, 1937. If Zachary was legally removed as president of the company, then the trial 'court should be affirmed. But, if that meeting be considered as an informal one, not in the nature of a directors’ meeting, then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. DornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stobo v. Davis Provision Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Innovative Adult Foster Care, Inc v. RaginMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Rare Earth, Inc. v. HoorelbekeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Salgo v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Lackawanna Pants Mfg. Co. v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. American Center for Education, Inc. v. CavnarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API