Legal Opinion
Baliles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1999No. 98-AA-440PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
The issue presented in this case is whether petitioner George Baliles, who sought temporary total disability benefits from April 1, 1995 to the present and continuing, voluntarily limited his income within the meaning of D.C.Code § 36-308(3)(V)(iii) (1997) by retir*662ing from his employment position at the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). The hearing examiner denied him temporary total disability benefits after April 1, 1995, the date of his retirement, and the Director of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) affirmed. Finding nothing in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Joyner v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hively v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In Re Dauphin County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Morrison v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. WashingtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.