Legal Opinion

Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1993No. 90-AA-733PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Associate Judge:

This case arises under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act, D.C.Code §§ 36-301 to -345 (1988) (the Act). Petitioner, Jerome Oubre, seeks review of a decision of the Department of Employment Services (DOES) reversing and setting aside a portion of a compensation award as determined by a hearing examiner. The Director of DOES reversed the examiner’s decision, concluding that the wage issue had been resolved conclusively in a prior proceeding involving the same accident and parties. Petitioner’s principal argument before this court is that res judi-cata…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Hutchinson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API