Legal Opinion

BE & K. CONST. v. Abbott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 2002No. 97,039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

59 P.3d 38 (2002)

2002 OK 75

B.E. & K. CONSTRUCTION and St. Paul Fire & Marine, Petitioners,

v.

Dennis ABBOTT and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 97,039.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 1, 2002.

John B. Vera, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioner.

Brandon Burton, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent.

KAUGER, J:

¶ 1 A single, first-impression, question of law[1] is presented:[2] whether an employee, volunteering for inclusion in an employer-planned reduction in force, is entitled to post-termination temporary total disability benefits[3] for an on-the-job injury. Under the facts presented,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Braden Manufacturing LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Diversified Rubber v. HarveyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API