Interstate Electric Co. v. Russell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a suit on a series of promissory notes, alleged to have been executed by appellees, Timmerman and Russell.
Russell filed a plea of discharge in bankruptcy, whereupon the court ordered the suit abated as to him, and after the evidence was concluded gave the affirmative charge for him. Appellant assigns as error the giving of this charge on the ground that the plea did not justify it, and because the suit had been abated as to him. Notwithstanding the order abating the suit as to him, the cause was tried as though this had not occurred. The discharge in bankruptcy was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Lazarus v. ShearerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Loveman Compress Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Milligan v. PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Davenport & Harris Undertaking Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Harnischfeger Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Krasner v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. StimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942