Legal Opinion
Loudonville Milling Co. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 14, 1948No. 7 Div. 952PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, Justice
(after stating the facts).
The suit is on the two promissory notes referred to in the statement of facts.
This is a second appeal. • On the first appeal, where decision -turned on a matter not here material, it was indicated that to defend on the ground of a conditional delivery of the notes and a iloncompliance with the condition an appropriate special plea would be necessary. Loudonville Milling Co. v. Davis, 248 Ala. 202, 205(7-8), 27 So.2d 6. Though decision in the lower court in the case now here was not rested on any such plea, since the case must be retried, we repeat the observation and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- S & H Contractors, Inc., a Corporation v. A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc., a Corporation, A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc. v. S & H Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Kennedy v. Boles Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Box v. BoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- SANWA BUSINESS CR. CORP. v. GB" Boots" Smith Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wise v. Grumman Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.