Davenport & Harris Undertaking Co. v. Roberson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
It is well understood that under section 9044 of the Code it may be shown in defense of a suit on a promissory note that there was an agreement between the maker and payee that it should not become effective, though placed in the care of the payee, until it was signed by certain other specified persons. Somerall v. Citizens’ Bank, 211 Ala. 630, 101 So. 429; Thompson v. Fourth National Bank, 214 Ala. 452, 108 So. 69; 8 C. J. 205 et seq.; Norwood v. Stinnett, 202 Ala. 349, 80 So. 431; Bank of Tallassee v. Jordan, 200 Ala. 182, 76 So. 930.
We think, however, that the evidence was not sufficient…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saint v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- West v. Kelly's Ex'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Somerall v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Walker v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Lake-side Land Co. v. DromgooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Frank Nelson, Jr. And Lee Etta Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Valley Min. Corp., Inc. v. Metro BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Steiner Bros. v. SlifkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.