Legal Opinion

Loudonville Milling Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 25, 1946No. 7 Div. 865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

The Loudonville Milling Company (appellant) brought suit against D. C. Davis and Kyle Davis, doing business under the firm name of D. C. Davis & Son and others (appellees) on a complaint based on a judgment for $2413.75 and costs,' rendered fon plaintiff against the defendants in the Common Pleas Court of Trumbull County, State of Ohio. Demurrer to the complaint was sustained. Thereupon the plaintiff amended its complaint by filing counts 2 and 3, each of which declared on a promissory note. These are the notes on which the Ohio judgment was based. The evidence was heard by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davenport & Harris Undertaking Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Stubblefield v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Monarch Refrigerating Co. v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Pointer v. Farmers' Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Interstate Electric Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Gilliland & Echols Farm Supply & Hatchery v. Credit Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Barnes v. HiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Moreno v. May Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Pearson v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API