LEXTON-ANCIRA, INCORPORATED v. Kay
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action for forcible entry and detainer for possession of the Commonwealth Building in Portland for the failure of defendants to pay rent and real estate taxes. Defendant Soseman is the lessee under a lease from plaintiff. Defendant Kay was the manager of the building for Soseman and guaranteed performance by Soseman of his obligations tinder the lease. The court entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. We affirm.
Defendant Soseman assigns as error the denial of his motion to quash the service of the summons upon him in California on the following grounds: (1) the summons…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hickey v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Owen J. Jones & Son, Inc. v. GospodinovicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- BALBOA APARTMENTS v. PatrickOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- South State Investment Co. v. BrigumOregon Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.