BALBOA APARTMENTS v. Patrick
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
ORS 105.135(3) requires a plaintiff in an action for forcible entry and detainer (FED) to serve the summons and complaint “by the end of the judicial day next following the payment of filing fees.” The issue in this case is whether failure to serve a summons and amended complaint within one day of the payment of filing fees requires dismissal of the FED action. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals concluded that such a failure did not require dismissal. We agree and affirm.
The relevant facts are few and undisputed. On May 27, 2008, plaintiff, Balboa Apartments, filed an FED complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Schroeder v. WoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Olson v. ChuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- LEXTON-ANCIRA, INCORPORATED v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alfieri v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- C.O. Homes, LLC v. ClevelandOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Peace River Seed Co-Operative, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Rucker v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Mehta v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.