Legal Opinion

Fina Oil & Chem Co v. Norton, Gale A.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 27, 2003No. 02-5241PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Under federal law, firms that extract natural gas from leased federal, tribal, or offshore lands pay the government royalties calculated as a percentage of the value of the production they extract. This case involves a valuation dispute concerning gas that is sold twice: first by the producer to a gas marketing firm it controls, and then by the controlled marketing firm to end-users. The Secretary of the Interior valued the gas production based on the contract price of the resale. Challenging that decision, the producer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amoco Prodn Co v. Watson, Rebecca W.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. California by and through Becerrav. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. BacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Marseilles Land & Water Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. UPMC Braddock v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API