Legal Opinion
UPMC Braddock v. Harris
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-1210PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
• PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This is an action to review a final agency decision by the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by the plaintiffs and the defendants, along with the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to supplement 'the administrative record. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, deny the plaintiffs’ motion…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Securities Industry & Financial Markets Ass'n v. United States Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. ZinkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Oceana, Inc. v. BrysonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Oceana, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Oceana, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.