Legal Opinion
Gardebring v. Jenkins
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 19, 1988No. 86-978PublishedCited by 233 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
In 1981 Congress amended the statute authorizing the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program to provide that a family receiving nonrecurring lump-sum income is ineligible for benefits for the number of months that the income would satisfy the family’s standard of need. §2304 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, 95 Stat. 845, as amended,1 42 U. S. C. § 602(a)(17) (1982 ed. and Supp. III); see generally Lukhard v. Reed, 481 U. S. 368, 371-373 (1987) (plurality opinion); see also id., at 384-386 (Powell, J., dissenting).2 In this case the United *418States Court of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lukhard v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Slaughter v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Slaughter v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Slaughter v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by233 opinions
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Amy Cohen v. Brown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. United States Department of Health and Human Services United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Halo v. Yale Health Plan, Director of Benefits & Records Yale UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Rodriguez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.