Legal Opinion

Linnekin v. Linnekin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to vacate an order for examination of defendant before trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

Motion to vacate an order obtained by plaintiff for the examination of defendant before trial. The action is for a separation. The order required the defendant to be examined as to his property. No defects in the papers upon which the order was made arc claimed. This motion is based solely upon the contention that in.no separation action can a defendant be examined before trial as to his means.

Were this a case of first impressions there would seem to be no force in defendant’s contention. The courts have very generally sustained the right to examine before trial adverse parties as to any fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Van Valkenburgh v. Van ValkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Moore v. ReinhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Danziger v. DanzigerNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fried v. FriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Altman v. AltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API