Legal Opinion

Altman v. Altman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

Motion to examine defendant before trial. This is an action for separation. Plaintiff seeks to examine her husband to show his earning capacity and assets. In her complaint she pleads that his income is $10,000 a year. The answer denies the allegation. Cases cited indicate that the First and Second Departments have refused such examinations. (Van Valkenburgh v. Van Valkenburgh, 149 App. Div. 482 [1st Dept.]; Safrin v. Safrin, 205 id. 628 [2d Dept.]; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 id. 710 [2d Dept.]; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 id. 745 [2d Dept.]; Fried v. Fried, 230 id. 708 [2d Dept.].)

The reasoning of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. Van ValkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Linnekin v. LinnekinNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sachs v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Casolaro v. BlauNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Neville v. NevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API