Legal Opinion

Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1906PublishedCited by 47 opinions

. Appeal by the defendant, .the H. S. Electro-Galvanizing Company, from an-order of the Supreme -Court,-made at the Hew York ,;Special;Term -and entered in the office of .the clerk of'the county of New York on the 30th- day of January, 1906, denying the defend- - ant’s motion to vacate an order for the examination- before trial of the president of the defendant company.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This action, was to recover commissions earned by the plaintiff under an agreement with the defendant, a foreign corporation, with a place of business in the county of Kings, in the city .-of New York. The action is at issue and on the calendar ready for trial. - On January 10, 1906, the plaintiff presented an affidavit to a justice of the Supreme Court, and upon that affidavit an order was granted requiring the president of the defendant to appear and be-examined pursuant to section 873 of the Code of- Civil Procedure, and to produce certain books of the corporation for use upon…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Schweinburg v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Wessel v. SchwarzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Shonts v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API