Legal Opinion
Fried v. Fried
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, without costs, amd motion granted, without costs, upon the authority of Safrin v. Safrin (205 App. Div. 628); Horsch v. Horsch (206 id. 710) and Hutaff v. Hutaff (208 id. 745). Linnekin v. Linnekin (96 Misc. 56) is contrary to the weight of authority and should not be followed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Safrin v. SafrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Linnekin v. LinnekinNew York Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Kirshner v. KirshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Appelbaum v. AppelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Augustin v. AugustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Malone v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930