McMullen v. Rousseau
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Yakey, J., entered. April 5, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before- the court 'without a jury, in an action to concel deeds and rescind a sale of land.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
There is no controversy over the material facts in this case. „ On and prior to the 22d day of [February, 1904, the plaintiffs were the owners of a tract of land, consisting of about one and one-half acres, in Ault’s addition to South Snohomish, which the court below found to be of the value of $262.50. The defendants Happell and wife owned an adjoining tract, and were desirous of acquiring the land of the plaintiffs for less than it was worth, or at least upon more favorable terms than they were willing to sell the same. Knowing that he could not acquire the land himself on satisfactory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- O'Connor v. LighthizerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Mulholland v. Washington Match Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Stack v. NolteWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Adams v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- McMillen v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Fischer v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.