Fischer v. Hillman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered September 2, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in actions by vendees for the rescission of land contracts.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, C. J.
These two actions were brought by the respondents severally and separately, to rescind a contract for the purchase of lands, and were afterwards, for convenience sake and for economy, joined and tried together. In what may be termed the Fischer case, the complaint, after setting up the interest of Clarence D. Hillman and his relation to the C. D. Hillman’s Snohomish County Land & Railroad Company, matters concerning which there seems to be no real controversy, alleges that Clarence D. Hillman represented and claimed that he owned and had a perfect title to *223certain lands desci’ibed in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Washington Central Improvement Co. v. NewlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Strand v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Best v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Fields v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Baird v. GibberdIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Horowitz v. KuehlWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Kalmans v. PowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.