Legal Opinion

United States v. Mandel Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 28, 1917No. 1776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7960 (T. D. 366S6).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yiiies, Judge

This was a mail importation at the port of Chicago. Due notice •of its arrival was sent the addressees, Mandel Bros., of that city, who, on March 1, 1915, called at the post office and delivered a paper •entitled “ Original. Entry of merchandise imported through the mails,” (signed) “ Mandel Bros., per O. M. M.” The paper bears stamp “ Chicago P. 0., paid March 6, 1915, customs mail,” which was the date on which the importing firm paid the estimated duties. The paper further bears stamp “ Custom House, Chicago, Ill. Paid March 18, 1915, Elmer Hill, cashier,” and “ Liquidated, March 19, 1915,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Goetze v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. United States v. General Electric Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Import Export Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API