Legal Opinion

Import Export Service v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1957No. C. D. 1869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

In this protest, it is claimed that there was a clerical error within the meaning of section 520 (c) (1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953, in that duty was assessed on a value of £800 when, in fact, the merchandise was valued at £100; that the value of £800 stated in the consular invoice was due to an inadvertent clerical error of the shipper; and that the entry should be reliquidated on the ground of clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence not amounting to an error in the construction of the law, in the appraisement…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
  3. Origet v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Wolff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AT&T International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  2. Lunitz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Berkery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Lunitz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API