Legal Opinion

United States v. General Electric Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1913No. Nos. 1062 and 1097; Nos. 1077 and 1085PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7402 (T. D. 32957).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

In one case a question of procedure of some importance is raised. The Government in its appeal contends that no appeal lies under subsection 14 to a classification board for a revision of a decision of the collector as to the rate or amount of duty chargeable upon merchandise imported, under conventions with foreign countries, through the parcel post.

The language of the section is—

That the decision of the collector as to the rate and amount of duties * * * shall be final and conclusive against all persons interested therein, unless the owner, importer, consignee, or agent of such merchandise,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. In re ChichesterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Cathay Crafts Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Phil. B. Bekeart Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. United States v. Mandel Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API