Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 25, 1929No. 3199; No. 3218Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Lenroot, Judge:

It is with regret that I feel compelled to dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority of the court in this case.. If the Customs Court had jurisdiction in an appeal for reappraisement to detérmine the question of whether the tugboat in question was imported merchandise, bringing it within the customs laws for purposes of duty, I should be in hearty accord with the conclusion of this court upon that question.

I am, however, unable to agree that this question can be raised in an appeal for reappraisement by challenging the jurisdiction of the Customs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Thatcher v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. In Re FassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API