Legal Opinion

Gear v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1963No. 7085PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

' In 1958 the City of Phoenix (appellee), pursuant .to a city- ordinance authorizing and directing the widening of north Seventh Street, instituted proceedings to condemn the. west seven feet of a lot owned by Robert L. Gear (appellant). Pursuant to stipulation the appellee posted an $8,000 bond and took immediate possession. The matter was subsequently tried before a jury and appellant received a verdict of $2,200 upon which judgment was entered. Appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. for $8,000 or for new trial was denied and he appealed.

Appellant complains of two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Brandt's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hillerege v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Roer Construction Corp. v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. City of Phoenix v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Moschetti v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Harsh Building Company v. BialacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API