Legal Opinion

Hillerege v. City of Scottsbluff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1957No. 34074PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

Appellant by this action seeks an injunction preventing appellees from erecting any structures which will interfere with the use of described parking areas of appellant unless and until appellees establish the right to do so by due process of law, and preventing appellees from giving effect to a designated contract made by them concerning the regulation of parking in the street adjacent to the front of described properties owned by appellant.

The appellant states three causes of action which are in substance the following:

The first relates she is the owner of specifically described real estate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Balog v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Payne v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Phillips Petroleum Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API