B. C. Richter Contracting Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
In these two consolidated actions two subcontractors have sued on the prime contractor’s surety bond. The plaintiffs sought what they termed “quantum meruit” recovery, measured by the reasonable value of unpaid labor and materials. The trial court limited their recovery to a lesser amount, the unpaid remainder of the contract price, plus interest and attorney fees. Plaintiffs appeal. Defendant surety companies appeal from that portion of the judgment awarding attorney fees.
The dispute grows out of the construction of Capehart Act 1 housing at Beale Air Force Base. The general scheme of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- S. Jon Kreedman v. MEYERS BROS. PARKING-WESTERNCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Robertson Lumber Co. v. Progressive Contractors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.