Legal Opinion
State v. Edwards
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1986No. CO-85-602PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Morris Richard Edwards appeals from nine convictions. He contends that (1) his previous convictions should not have been admitted into evidence; (2) fingerprint evidence should not have been admitted; (3) the trial court erred in not admitting “reverse Spriegl” evidence; (4) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdicts; and (5) there were not substantial and compelling circumstances that justified an upward sentencing departure. We affirm but modify the sentence.
FACTS
Appellant was charged with numerous crimes against four victims that took…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Groves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.