Legal Opinion

State v. Harwell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1994No. CX-93-1656PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

In this second degree felony murder case, appellant Jewell Harwell claims that his right to a fair trial was violated because the trial court failed to respond properly to a question the jury raised during deliberations. Appellant further challenges the double durational departure in sentencing and the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court. Because we find that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in .responding to the jury’s question and in imposing a 300-month term of imprisonment, but plainly erred in ordering restitution to be paid to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. CrimsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. State v. DendyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API