Legal Opinion
State v. Hebert
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1990No. S-3357PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINO WITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
Petitioners are eight herring sac roe fishermen who were charged with violating 5 AAC 27.987 by fishing in the Norton Sound district after having fished in another area. 1 That regulation established two “superexclusive” use fisheries in the central Bering Sea, Cape Romanzof and Norton Sound. 2 The regulation prohibits fishermen who operate in one of the superex-clusive fisheries from participating in any other herring sac roe fishery. The converse is also true: fishermen who operate outside a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Interior Alaska Airboat Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Burnor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Ogle v. Salamatof Native Ass'n, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.