Legal Opinion
Haumant v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 2005No. A04-1746PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Donald Haumant appeals from an order denying his request for an injunction requiring respondent, the City of Minneapolis’ Director of Elections, to place a proposed charter amendment on the November 2, 2004 general-election ballot for Minneapolis. Because the election has passed, Haumant now seeks an order requiring respondent to hold a special election. Haumant argues that (1) respondent must submit a proposed charter amendment to the voters unless it is manifestly unconstitutional, (2) the proposed charter amendment is not unconstitutional, (3) respondent’s reasons to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Raich v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Town of Lowell v. City of CrookstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Tyler Vasseur v. City of Minneapolis, Ginny Gelms, in her official capacity as Elections Manager, Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Michael Joseph Berent, Michael Steven Romp, Jeff Wayne Thorne, Paul Bryson Ingram, Nichelle Aline Thompson, Rodney Edward Sullivan, Sara Lillis Epstein, Sara Crane Swisher, Bette Jayne Mayes, Caroline M. Dieterle, Matt Blizek, Mori Constantino, Amanda Coyne, Lolly Eggers, Ellen Haywood, Jon Klinkowitz, Karen Kubby, Bob Thompson, James Walters, Roberta Till Retz And Jennie Louise EmbreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.