Legal Opinion
State v. Kuhlman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 2006No. A06-568Published
1Opinion of the Court
722 N.W.2d 1 (2006)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant
v.
Daniel Alan KUHLMAN, Respondent.
No. A06-568.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
September 22, 2006.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Mary Ellen Heng, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
Howard Bass, Bass Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Burnsville, MN, for respondent.
Faison T. Sessoms Jr., Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge; RANDALL, Judge; and WILLIS, Judge.
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.