Legal Opinion

Raich v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2003No. 03-15481PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1224OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Two of the appellants, Angel MeClary Raich and Diane Monson, are seriously ill Californians who use marijuana for medical purposes on the recommendation of their doctors. Such use is legal under California’s Compassionate Use Act. Mon-son grows her own medical marijuana. The remaining two appellants, John Doe Number One and John Doe Number Two, assist Raich in growing her marijuana. On October 9, 2002, the appellants filed suit against John Ashcroft, the Attorney General of the United States, and Asa Hutchinson, the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Raich v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Oregon v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API