Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Rochat

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1983No. 82-15, SC 29242PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused is charged with violations of DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), which provide:

“A lawyer shall not: * * * (5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. (6) Engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.”

The charges arise out of an incident which occurred in the Grand Jury room of the Multnomah County Courthouse and out of a course of conduct involving interaction between the accused and court employees whose duties concerned the appointment of counsel for indigents.

From the record made before the Trial Board, we find the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Medical Examiners v. MintzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API