Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard R. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 2011No. 10–0912PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Disciplinary Board filed a complaint alleging the respondent, Richard R. Schmidt, violated ethical rules by communicating with a represented party without the consent of opposing counsel or a court order and by engaging in domestic abuse. The grievance commission found Schmidt’s conduct violated provisions of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended Schmidt’s license be suspended for six months. Having considered the record, we agree Schmidt committed ethical violations. We disagree, however, with the commission’s sanction recommendation;…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API